In the introduction to my coffee table book on tornadoes and waterspouts in Europe, I wrote that there are still more historical depictions of these meteorological phenomena in libraries and archives across Europe waiting to be re-discovered. A tweet posted recently by Warrington Museum showed that I was right. The tweet was companied by a beautiful depiction of the "singular phenomena" that occurred on 16 June 1798 in the neighbourhood of Warrington. Almost immediately I contacted Warrington Archives and Local History and they were very helpful in providing more details about the event, details published in an article in The Gentleman's Magazine, and Historical Chronicle in August 1799. A transcript of the article is shown below.

[...] A dark thick cloud of a considerable extent and forming almost a direct line parallel to the horizon lowered over part of the adjoining country, chiefly Cheshire, when towards the centre a water spout of immense magnitude appeared lengthening by degrees until it assumed a formidable appearance in the shape of a sugar loaf reversed and extending from base to point to the eye of the spectator nearly 1-16th of the whole hemisphere.  It moved in a curvilinear form the point inclining from the South, the cloud stretching out due North and South. It frequently varied its size sometimes extending within a few feet of the ground then seemingly drawn upwards. At one time it remained stationary in respect to form and situation for near ten minutes but never burst not meeting as supposed with attracting fluid which at sea serves to form that immense body of water which at last breaks from its own weight. After varying its length for some moments longer it entirely disappeared and was embodied in the cloud. Between the cloud and the horizon the sky appeared a dusky yellow which served to mark the dark edge of the cloud and the waterspout with a peculiar gloom. After the appearance of this phaenomenon there was scarce a day passed here for the continuance of nearly a month that it did not rain in perfect torrent. Its appearances were during the time of the Newton races to the no little dismay of the crowd assembled on that occasion and to the horror of the farmers who foreboded in consequence some most melancholy catastrophe to their harvest. I send you a drawing taken on the spot of the singular appearance it presented.
— The Gentleman's Magazine, and Historical Chronicle (1799)
The "singular phenomena" observed on 16 June 1798 in the neighbourhood of Warrington (courtesy of Warrington Archives and Local History, Culture Warrington).

The "singular phenomena" observed on 16 June 1798 in the neighbourhood of Warrington (courtesy of Warrington Archives and Local History, Culture Warrington).

Form the description is not clear if this event was indeed a tornado, a waterspout, or a funnel cloud that extended very closed to the ground. Nevertheless, this is another great example of how detailed and beautiful are some of the historical descriptions and depictions of tornadoes, waterspouts, and funnel clouds in Europe. 

(Many thanks, to David Gelsthorpe (@paleomanchester) from the Manchester Museum for pointing to me the tweet from Warrington Museum (@warringtonmus), and to Warrington Archives and Local History, Culture Warrington for their help. #archivescience #explorearchives.)

Posted
AuthorBogdan Antonescu

Poster presented at the 8th European Conference on Severe Storm, Wiener Neustadt, Austria, 14–18 September 2015. A PDF version of the poster can be found here

Two weeks ago, I have presented this poster on the early theories on tornado formation at the 8th European Conference on Severe Storms. The poster shows the major contributors, from Aristotle to Peltier, and their theories on the formation of tornadoes. Given the size of the poster, I was not able to include all the contributions. There is one contribution in particular which I think deserves more attention - "On the violence of the tornado, and the storm",  Book 1, Chapter XI from Historiade Gentibus Septentrionalibus (History of the Nordic People) by Olaus Magnus. 

Olaus Magnus (or, Olof Månsson) a Swedish ecclesiastic, historian and geographer, was born at Linköping in 1490. In 1510 he began his ecclesiastic studies in Germany and returned to Sweden in 1517. Like his elder brother, Johannes Magnus, Olaus obtained several ecclesiastical positions, as canon at Uppsala and Linköping, and then as archdeacon of Strängnäs. In 1523, King Gustave I appointed Johannes Magnus as Archbishop of Uppsala.  After Gustav I's breaking with the Catholic Church, Johannes accompanied by Olaus as his secretary went to Rome in 1537. Johannes died in 1544, and Olaus was appointed as his successor in Uppsala. This was nothing more than a title since by this time Sweden was not Catholic anymore. Olaus spend the rest of his life in Italy, for the most part in Rome were he died in 1558.

The cover of the History of the Northern People (Rome, 1555) courtesy of Google Books.

Olaus Magnus is mainly remembered today for his History of the Northern People printed in Rome in 1555. The History, one of the first works about the Sweden and its inhabitants, also depicts the history and folklore of other north European countries. The History is divided into 22 books and 476 chapters illustrated with 353 woodcuts.  

Another work by Olaus Magnus to which many illustrations from the History refer to is the Carta Marina. Drawn by Olaus between 1529–1539, this is a stunningly detailed map and one of the earlies maps of the Nordic countries. The map also contains a very accurate depiction of the oceanic currents between the Iceland and Faroe Islands. Rossby and Miller (2003) argued that whorls drawn in the ocean by Olaus are to deliberate to be purely artistic expression. Instead, they are representations of the Iceland-Faroe front, that "separates the warm waters flowing north between Iceland and Faroes from the cold waters flowing east east and south around the northern coast of Iceland" (Rosbby and Miller, 2003, p. 87).

Let's now return to Chapter 11 (Books 1) "On the violence of the tornado, and the storm" from the History. As the title indicates, this chapter is devoted to the effects of tornadoes and storms in general. The illustration accompanying the chapter shows a tornado (turbo, in the original Latin text) uprooting trees and lifting the roofs of a church and a house.

Woodcut from the chapter "On the violence of tornado, and the storm" from the History of the Nordic People by Olaus Magnus. (source: www.avrosys.nu).

 Here is the translation form Latin by Cassia Price of the chapter. 

As all who tell the secrets of nature or who have observed them know, tornadoes, and the storms of Northern places, have awesome and dangerous energy. Especially because of the complex and unfailing cause of their origins, the means for which might be found. Therefore, a tornado (argues Isidore), is the twisting of winds, and this has been said on earth as many times as the wind rouses itself, and the earth is sent into a spin: this tornado brings about even more winds from the struggle with itself (Seneca is a witness of this in his Naturales quaestiones). And these areas are caught up around the earth and brought forth: and for this reason orchards are torn from their roots, and whatever it broods over it strips bare to the ground, and, at the same time, ripping up the trees, and the rooves just lower than the clouds; at any rate nothing is higher. Its shape is round: while the wheeling column spins itself, all the clouds seize it quicker and quicker. And its motion is wandering, dividing, swirling. But then it cannot stay, for it struggles, because it is wandering, inconstant air; at the end however, it moves least of all. And so no storm lasts long. But the commotions of storms, however much more power they might have, the less time they last, having arrived, because when they come to their climax, all the force is diminished, and that excitement is necessary so that it might exert itself to the point of its own ruin. And so no one has seen a tornado for a full day, not even for an hour. Their speed is extraordinary, and how short-lived they are, remarkable. The more forcefully and quickly it turns around the earth, the slacker it becomes, and, on account of this they fall apart. For it is made with the divided air troubled by some clouds, and it turns about, but making a ring around it, so that a part of the cloud is drawn in, as if it is inseparable from it, and it seizes it, moving in circles, its end is not to be found, turning in on itself again. From waves and from the sea it often sweeps up the waters under boats, and knocks sailors high from underneath: from land it scatters snatched up rocks and other animals and small trifles. Not only that by the lead rooves of temples and all sorts of houses, and indeed even those of the strongest materials, are seized by the air, and from elsewhere the air, joining more vigorously, carries it to an area further away. Most wisely, when huge stones have been rolled along from the windmill, sound against the storm, those people who are safe are taken to far off places. Indeed, so huge is the storm that descends that, enveloping the towns, citadels, and villages, rooves far and wide (so it is said) are bourn to the fields, according to Vincent, Book XXV, Speculum Historiae, Chapter LXXXVII, as he bears witness in Book XXVI, Chapter XXVI, making mention of the tornado. Not in the account of Diodorus Siculus, missing from Book VI of his Historia, saying the amazing force of the wind is in the directions of Aquilo. For in summer the Occidental and Septentrional last with such great force and vigour of the winds that it seizes rocks from the earth of such a size that a hand can hold. It builds them into piles that are not small as if they were sand or pebbles, and finally, from men it might snatch weapons and clothing, whereas from a horse it might steal their rider by force, as he mentioned in the next chapter. In fact, as it happens at some point in Vichia Norvegiae, through the air and the great burning sun, the largest fish in rich fishing places, driven from the streams, from their fishing poles like planks of wood in great heaps, were received as a gift given by God. But no one is entitled to demand action, for God reserves judgment to help he needy.
— "On the violence of the tornado, and the storm"

In his explanations of the origin of tornadoes, Olaus relies on two theories. In the first theory, proposed by Isidore of Seville  (c. 560–636), "the last scholar of the ancient world" and the patron saint of the Internet, tornadoes are produced by the "twisting of winds" (I would discuss Isidore's theory in more details in the next blog post). The second theory in which the tornado "brings about even more winds from the struggle with itself" is attributed by Olaus to Seneca (c. 4 BC–AD 65). As far as I am aware this theory was first proposed by Aristotle (384–322 BC), who stated that tornadoes are produced by the winds trapped in the cloud, spinning around trying to get out and producing cone or column shaped clouds (see Theory 2 in the above poster).  After discussing their origin, Olaus describes the characteristics tornadoes. Tornadoes are "round while the wheeling column spins itself", their motions is "wandering, dividing, swirling", they have short life time ("no one has seen a tornado for a full day, not even for an hour") and their "speed is extraordinary".  The chapter ends with descriptions the effects of tornadoes: "huge stones have been rolled along from the windmill" by tornadoes, also "from men it my snatch weapons and clothing, whereas from a horse it might steal their rider by [their] force".  Thus, as in the case of the Carta Marina, Olaus provides in this chapter from the History stunning details of tornadoes and their effects. Not only this, but in Chapter 35 (Book 1) "On the Signification of Thunderstorms for Every Specific Month" Olaus describes the annual cycle of thunderstorms over Sweden.

Woodcut from the chapter "On the Signification of Thunderstorms for Every Specific Month"  from the History of the Nordic People by Olaus Magnus (source: www.avrosys.nu).

In this early "infographic", the year is symbolized by the ribbon. On the ribbon the month are represented by letters i) the summer months: - A-Aprilis, M-Maius, I-Iunius, I-Iulius, A-Augustus, and S-September (upper part of the ribbon) and ii) the winter months: O-October, N-November, D-December, I-Ianuaris, F-Februarius and M-Martius (lower part of the ribbon). The summer months are associated with more rain (upper part of the figure) and lightning (the emerging branches from the letters representing the months, with more branches indicating more frequent thunderstorms). The winter months are associated with more snow (lower part of the figure). This annual cycle, shows that thunderstorms occur all year round in Sweden,  with a maximum between May and August. This is consistent with the annual cycle of tornadoes in Sweden, with tornadoes reported in almost every month in Sweden and a maximum between June and August (see Fig. 5 from this paper). 

A beautiful representation of a tornado near Hague (Netherlands) on July 1751 by the Dutch lawyer Jan Francois Dryfhout. This is one of the very few representations of tornadoes from the 18th Century (the majority of the depictions from this period were for waterspouts). The case was not included by Wegener in his collection of tornadoes and waterspouts in Europe (Wegener 1917). 

Fig. 1 - Plate I from Dryfhout (1757) showing the evolution of a tornado near Hague on July 1751 (courtesy of Universiteitsbibliotheek Gent).

The first Plate (Fig. 1) shows the evolution of the tornado from growth to decay (Plate I, Figs. IV). Figure V show the final stage when the tornado was drifting out to sea "having lost its upright posture, [it] was blown upward toward south, in the manner of a fluttering ribbon" (Leighly 1974). 

Fig. 2 - Plate II from Dryfhout (1757) showing the parent cloud of a tornado near Hague on July 1751 (courtesy of Universiteitsbibliotheek Gent).

The second Plate (Fig. 2) shows the parent cloud of the tornado and suggest the presence of mammatus clouds (see Schultz et al. 20056 for a review). Dryfhout describes the parent cloud as "composed of a great number of smaller cloudlets, resembling round balls" (Leighly 1974).  

The complete description of this event can be found here. Unfortunately I can not read Dutch, but I would be very gratefully for any help on obtaining more details about this tornado (and maybe we can write a short article about it).

source: Dryfhout, J. F.:  Nauuwkeurige beschouwinge van een hoos, benevens een ondersoek, 
hoe dezelve geboren worden en werken (A detailed examination of a tornado formation and additional research on how they form and function). Verhandelingen uitgegeven door de Hollandsche Maatschappij der Wetenschappen te Haarlem, 3, 321377. (PDF via Google Books).

References

Leighly, J., 1974: An Early Drawing and Description of a Tornado, Isis, 65, 474486. (link)

Wegener, A. L., 1917: Wind- und Wasserhosen in Europa. Vieweg, Braunschweig, 301 pp. (link)

Today I have submitted to Monthly Weather Review a manuscript written together with David M. Schultz and Fiona Lomas (University of Manchester) on European tornadoes. The manuscript, a synthesis of the European tornado datasets, is also a short history of tornado observations in Europe and a literature review of the major contributions on tornado research in Europe.  

There are three reasons for which we believe that this research was necessary. First, there is not a widespread recognition or the threat of tornadoes in Europe, and this lead to an underestimate of the importance of tornadoes in the current climate in Europe. Second, to better understand the climatology of tornadoes in Europe we need to understand the evolution of tornado databases for different European countries and to identifying the major influences on the development of these databases. Third,  when considering the possible influence of climate change on severe convective storms, the first step is to consider the
observational data. Without knowing what is occurring now, how many tornadoes occur each
year in Europe, and what is the current spatial distribution of tornadoes, all the analyses
of the influence of climate change on tornadoes are premature.

 

We hoped that this manuscript of the current knowledge on tornadoes in Europe [in a way, this is a companion paper to Groenemeijer & Kühne (2014)] will encourage further discussions and stimulate the interest of the scientific community, national meteorological services and the public on European tornadoes. We hope that this would result in increased awareness, in the identification of new data sources, or in the initiation of new databases that would allow a extension of the current European tornado database both in time and in space. 

You can read the draft of the paper here.